badly_knitted (badly_knitted) wrote,
badly_knitted
badly_knitted

  • Location:
  • Mood:
  • Music:

Double Drabble: Jack’s Plans - Companion piece to Valentine Planning

Title: Jack’s Plans - Companion piece to 'Valentine Planning'

Author: badly_knitted

Characters: Jack, Ianto

Rating: PG

Spoilers: Nada.

Summary: Jack has plans for Valentine’s Day that Ianto doesn’t know about.

Word Count: 200

Written For: Prompt #387: Valentine’s Day, at slashthedrabble.

Disclaimer: I don’t own Torchwood, or the characters. They belong to the BBC.







Jack has plans for Valentine’s Day and Ianto doesn’t have a clue. The young Welshman is under the impression that if the Rift cooperates, they’ll have a quiet meal together at home, otherwise they’ll be on duty at the Hub so that their friends can enjoy the most romantic night of the year with their loved ones.



He’s wrong!



True, it wasn’t worth booking a restaurant, but Jack has arranged to have their romantic, candle-lit meal catered, complete with a discreet waiter to serve them. They’ll be eating at their flat because Jack has also arranged for a friend of his to keep an eye on the Hub for a few hours. Mickey Mouse can be trusted to handle things and only call Jack in if absolutely necessary. Jack’s hoping he’ll stay on afterwards as a new recruit; he’d fit right in.



There will be flowers of course, rich red roses because red is Ianto’s colour, as well as being the colour associated with Valentine’s Day. He’s brought chocolates too; the soft kind that will melt easily so they can be licked off each other. Nobody ever said romance couldn’t be sexy!



This will be their best Valentine’s Day yet!



The End





Tags: fic, fic: one-shot, fic: pg, ficlet, ianto jones, jack harkness, jack/ianto, torchwood fic
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 16 comments